Comparison
Sjokodrikk vs Kakaopulver
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sjokodrikk | Kakaopulver |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 478 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 21.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 12.4 g |
| Sugars | 81 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.7 g | 29 g |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sjokodrikk has 19% fewer calories (387 kcal vs 478 kcal).
- Sjokodrikk has 89% less fat (2.4 g vs 21.7 g).
- Sjokodrikk has 90% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 12.4 g).
- Kakaopulver has no sugar, while Sjokodrikk has 81 g.
- Kakaopulver has 80% more fiber (29 g vs 5.7 g).
- Kakaopulver has 80% more protein (22 g vs 4.4 g).
Ingredients
Sjokodrikk
sukker, dekstrose, fettredusert kakaopulver, emulgator (E 322 vegetabilsk), salt, vanillin
Kakaopulver
100% rent økologisk kakaopulver produsert av rå kakaobønner.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sjokodrikk or Kakaopulver?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sjokodrikk has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 478 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kakaopulver has less sugar: 0 g versus 81 g per 100 g.