Comparison

Sirop de pamplemousse rose vs Sirop de pamplemousse rose

Overall, Sirop de pamplemousse rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientSirop de pamplemousse roseSirop de pamplemousse rose
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 314 kcal 278 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 76 g 61 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sirop de pamplemousse rose has 11% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 314 kcal).
  • Sirop de pamplemousse rose has no fat, while Sirop de pamplemousse rose has 0.5 g.
  • Sirop de pamplemousse rose has 20% less sugar (61 g vs 76 g).
  • Sirop de pamplemousse rose has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Sirop de pamplemousse rose has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sirop de pamplemousse rose

pur sucre de France, eau, jus de fruits à base de jus concentré 14% (pamplemousse 7%, citron), acidifiant : acide citrique, arôme naturel de pamplemousse et autres arômes naturels, arôme naturel, ingrédients colorants : extrait de carotte, cassis.

Sirop de pamplemousse rose

Jus de pamplemousse rose à base de concentré (48%), sirop de glucose-fructose, sucre, acidifiant:acide citrique, arômes naturels de pamplemousse avec autres arômes naturels, concentré de carotte pourpre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sirop de pamplemousse rose or Sirop de pamplemousse rose?

Overall, Sirop de pamplemousse rose has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sirop de pamplemousse rose has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 314 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sirop de pamplemousse rose has less sugar: 61 g versus 76 g per 100 g.

More comparisons