Comparison
Sirop cola vs Cola
Overall, Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sirop cola | Cola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 83 g | 10.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cola has 87% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 336 kcal).
- Cola has 87% less sugar (10.6 g vs 83 g).
- Cola has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sirop cola
Not available.
Cola
Eau gazéifiée - sucre - colorant : E150d - acidifiant : acide orthophosphorique - arôme naturel - caféine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sirop cola or Cola?
Overall, Cola has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cola has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cola has less sugar: 10.6 g versus 83 g per 100 g.