Sélection vs Succo Albiccoca
Overall, Sélection has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sélection | Succo Albiccoca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 61 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 12.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sélection has 25% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 61 kcal).
- Sélection has 22% less sugar (10 g vs 12.9 g).
- Succo Albiccoca has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Sélection is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sélection
Eau, purée d'abricot 40%, sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Succo Albiccoca
Acqua, purea di albicocca 40%, zucchero, aromi, vitamina C. S
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sélection or Succo Albiccoca?
Overall, Sélection has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sélection has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sélection has less sugar: 10 g versus 12.9 g per 100 g.