Comparison
Sekt mild vs Effervescente
Overall, Sekt mild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sekt mild | Effervescente |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 272 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 66 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 10.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sekt mild has no calories, while Effervescente has 272 kcal.
- Sekt mild has no sugar, while Effervescente has 66 g.
- Sekt mild has no salt, while Effervescente has 10.8 g.
Ingredients
Sekt mild
Sekt
Effervescente
Preparato granul - hsredeoti: zjxchero; cor
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sekt mild or Effervescente?
Overall, Sekt mild has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sekt mild has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 272 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sekt mild has less sugar: 0 g versus 66 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Comté de Lormontiers dem... vs Sekt mild
Crémant D´Alsace, Schaum... vs Sekt mild
Sekt mild vs Melograno e arancia
Crémant de Bourgogne bru... vs Sekt mild
Sekt mild vs Moscato
Comté de Lormontiers dem... vs Effervescente
Crémant D´Alsace, Schaum... vs Effervescente
Melograno e arancia vs Effervescente