Comparison

Savane vs Brossard - Savane Mini Dark Chocolate Marble Cakes, 210g (7.5oz)

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSavaneBrossard - Savane Mini Dark...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 431 kcal 433 kcal
Fat 24 g 23 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 3.3 g
Sugars 24 g 23 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.5 g
Fiber 5.3 g 5.8 g
Protein 5.9 g 5.6 g
Additives55
AllergensEggs, Gluten, SoybeansEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Only Savane lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Savane

Farine de BLE 26,1%, OEUFS frais, sucre, huile de colza, chocolat 5,8% (sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithines, arôme naturel de vanille), fibre de racine de chicorée, stabilisant : glycérol, jaune d'OEUF, gomme d'acacia (fibre soluble), poudres à lever : carbonates de sodium - citrates de sodium, cacao en poudre, sel, fibres de BLE, amidon de maïs, arôme.

Brossard - Savane Mini Dark Chocolate Marble Cakes, 210g (7.5oz)

ble flour 22,2%, fresh eggs, rapeseed oil, sugar, dark chocolate 6,7% (sugar, cocoa paste, cocoa butter, emulsifier: sunflower lecithin, natural vanilla flavor), stabilizer: glycerol, soluble ble fiber, crystallized invert sugar syrup, ble starch, cocoa powder, baking powders: diphosphates - sodium carbonates, emulsifier: mono - and fatty acid diglycerides, preservative: potassium sorbate, flavouring,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Savane or Brossard - Savane Mini Dark Chocolate Marble Cakes, 210g (7.5oz)?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Savane has fewer calories: 431 kcal versus 433 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Brossard - Savane Mini Dark Chocolate Marble Cakes, 210g (7.5oz) has less sugar: 23 g versus 24 g per 100 g.

More comparisons