Comparison

Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes vs Saucisson Sec Noisettes

Overall, Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisson Sec De Savoie Aux...Saucisson Sec Noisettes
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 408 kcal 427 kcal
Fat 33 g 33 g
Saturated fat 11 g 12 g
Sugars 2 g 2.1 g
Salt 4.5 g 5 g
Protein 24.5 g 22 g
Additives02
AllergensMilk, NutsMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes has 10% less salt (4.5 g vs 5 g).
  • Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes has 10% more protein (24.5 g vs 22 g).
  • Only Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes

Viande de porc origine France, NOISETTES, LACTOSE, sel, saccharose, dextrose, épices et plante aromatique, conservateurs nitrate de potassium-nitrite de sodium, ferments. Boyau naturel de porc.

Saucisson Sec Noisettes

Viande de porc (origine: UE NOISETTES 4,48%, préparation pour saucissons secs (LACTOSE, épices, dextrose, sucre, ail, conservateur: nitrate de potassium), sel, conservateur: nitrite de sodium, ferment. Boyau naturel de porc. 127 g minimum de viande mise en œuvre pour 100g de produit fini. Produit soumis à dessiccation. Traces éventuelles de : gluten, soja, fruits à coques 33g

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes or Saucisson Sec Noisettes?

Overall, Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes has fewer calories: 408 kcal versus 427 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisson Sec De Savoie Aux Noisettes has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons