Saucisson à l’ail fumé vs Saucisson à l'ail
Overall, Saucisson à l'ail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisson à l’ail fumé | Saucisson à l'ail |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 224 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 17.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.9 g | 7.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 16.1 g |
| Additives | 5 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisson à l'ail has 17% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 269 kcal).
- Saucisson à l'ail has 24% less fat (17.4 g vs 23 g).
- Saucisson à l'ail has 22% less saturated fat (7.7 g vs 9.9 g).
- Saucisson à l’ail fumé has 98% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Saucisson à l'ail has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Saucisson à l’ail fumé
Viande de porc (origine : France) 84%, eau, protéines de sang, sel, ail déshydraté 0,5%, sirop de glucose, dextrose, épices, antioxydant: érythorbate de sodium, acidifiants : lactate de potassium et diacétate de sodium, conservateurs: chlorure de potassium et nitrite de sodium. Fumé au bois de hêtre.
Saucisson à l'ail
Viande de porc (90%), sel, dextrose ,aromes, epices et plantes aromatiques, ail 0,2%, antioxydants: e301-e316, conservateur : e250 - e326, acidifiant: e262, colorant : e120.{traces}traces de gluten, oeufs et lait{/traces}
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisson à l’ail fumé or Saucisson à l'ail?
Overall, Saucisson à l'ail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucisson à l'ail has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 269 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisson à l’ail fumé has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.