Comparison

Saucisses cocktail vs Saucisses Cocktail

Overall, Saucisses cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisses cocktailSaucisses Cocktail
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 257 kcal 268 kcal
Fat 23 g 24.8 g
Saturated fat 8.6 g 9.9 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0.3 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0.9 g 0.5 g
Protein 11 g 10.5 g
Additives24
AllergensMilkEggs, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saucisses cocktail has 13% less saturated fat (8.6 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Saucisses Cocktail has 79% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Saucisses cocktail has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Saucisses Cocktail lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Saucisses cocktail

Viande de porc 75%, eau, gras de porc, sel, sucre, arômes naturels, protéines de _lait_, fibres de carotte, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments. Viande de porc origine France. Peut contenir des traces d'œufs.

Saucisses Cocktail

Saucisses cocktail : viande de porc (69% sur les saucisses) ; eau ; gras de porc ; sel ; blanc d'oeuf en poudre ; plasma de porc ; dextrose ; arômes ; épaississant : carraghénanes ; stabilisants : E451, E450 ; protéines de lait ; lactose ; épices et aromates ; arômes naturels ; arôme naturel de paprika ; arôme de fumée ; conservateur : E250 ; fumée liquide. Jus : eau, sel, arôme de fumée. Traces de gluten, céleri et moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisses cocktail or Saucisses Cocktail?

Overall, Saucisses cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saucisses cocktail has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisses Cocktail has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons