Saucisse De Veau vs St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst
Overall, Saucisse De Veau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucisse De Veau | St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 255 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.4 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucisse De Veau has 60% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Saucisse De Veau has 25% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Saucisse De Veau has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
- Saucisse De Veau has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Saucisse De Veau lists: Eggs, Gluten, Soybeans.
- Only St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Saucisse De Veau
viande de veau (93%),eau,sel,vinaigre,dextrose, arômes naturels, extrait d'épices, saccharose, betterave rouge, épices.Boyau naturel de mouton.Présence possible de lait,blé,soja et oeuf. Viandes : Origine UE.
St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst
Viande de veau 37% (Suisse), lait 25% (Suisse [Appenzell]), lard (Suisse), viande de porc 19% (Suisse), sel de cuisine iodé, épices, stabilisants (E 262, E 450, E452), jus de citron en poudre. Enveloppe boyau de porc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucisse De Veau or St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst?
Overall, Saucisse De Veau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
St. Galler Kalbsbratwurst has fewer calories: 252 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucisse De Veau has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1 g per 100 g.