Comparison

Saucisse de Toulouse LR vs Saucisse de Toulouse

Overall, Saucisse de Toulouse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaucisse de Toulouse LRSaucisse de Toulouse
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 208 kcal 174 kcal
Fat 16 g 12 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 5.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 1.9 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 16 g 16 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedMustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saucisse de Toulouse has 16% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Saucisse de Toulouse has 25% less fat (12 g vs 16 g).
  • Saucisse de Toulouse has 18% less saturated fat (5.6 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Saucisse de Toulouse has no sugar, while Saucisse de Toulouse LR has 0.7 g.
  • Only Saucisse de Toulouse lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Saucisse de Toulouse LR

93% viande de porc* (Origine: France), sel, arômes naturels, dextrose, épices, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium ; plantes aromatiques, boyau naturel de porc. *Issus de porcs nourris sans OGM (< 0,9%)

Saucisse de Toulouse

Viande de porc (92%), eau, sel, sucres (dextrose, saccharose), arômes naturels, épices et plantes aromatiques (ail, coriandre, gingembre, paprika, poivre, raifort), conservateur : vinaigre tamponné, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, boyaux naturels de porc. Viande de porc issue d'animaux élevés dans le Pays d'Oc et nourris sans OGM (<0,9%).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saucisse de Toulouse LR or Saucisse de Toulouse?

Overall, Saucisse de Toulouse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saucisse de Toulouse has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saucisse de Toulouse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons