Comparison
Saucenbinder Hell vs Saucenbinder Hell
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Saucenbinder Hell | Saucenbinder Hell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 363 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 9.1 g | 5.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milchzuckererzeugnis | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saucenbinder Hell has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Saucenbinder Hell has 40% less sugar (5.5 g vs 9.1 g).
- Only Saucenbinder Hell lists: Milchzuckererzeugnis.
Ingredients
Saucenbinder Hell
Stärke, Maltodextrin, _Milchzuckererzeugnis_, Reismehl
Saucenbinder Hell
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Saucenbinder Hell or Saucenbinder Hell?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saucenbinder Hell has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saucenbinder Hell has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.