Comparison

Sauce Arrabiata vs Arrabbiata Piment

Overall, Arrabbiata Piment has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSauce ArrabiataArrabbiata Piment
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 288 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 27 g 4.3 g
Saturated fat 3 g 0.5 g
Sugars 6.7 g 5.2 g
Salt 2 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.9 g 2.7 g
Protein 2.2 g 1.5 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Arrabbiata Piment has 74% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 288 kcal).
  • Arrabbiata Piment has 84% less fat (4.3 g vs 27 g).
  • Arrabbiata Piment has 83% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Arrabbiata Piment has 22% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Arrabbiata Piment has 55% less salt (0.9 g vs 2 g).
  • Arrabbiata Piment has 31% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Sauce Arrabiata has 32% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Arrabbiata Piment has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Arrabbiata Piment is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sauce Arrabiata

Purée de tomates 71%, Huile de tournesol, Tomates séchées, Sel, Arômes naturels, Fructose, Vinaigre de vin, Oignon en poudre, Ail, Huile d'olive vierge extra, Piment en poudre, Poivre noir moulu, Correcteur d'acidité: Acide lactique, Sucre.

Arrabbiata Piment

Tomates** 75%, tomates séchées** 18,5%, huile de tournesol*, huile d'olive extra vierge*, flocons de pommes de terre, paprika, jus de citron**, poudre de piment** 0,05%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sauce Arrabiata or Arrabbiata Piment?

Overall, Arrabbiata Piment has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Arrabbiata Piment has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 288 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Arrabbiata Piment has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons