Comparison
Sangria vs Sangría
Overall, Sangria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sangria | Sangría |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.9 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sangria has 14% less sugar (6.9 g vs 8 g).
- Only Sangría lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Sangria
Not available.
Sangría
Vino tinto, agua, azúcar, acidulante: ácido citrico y extractos naturales de frutas y de canela.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sangria or Sangría?
Overall, Sangria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sangria has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 72 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sangria has less sugar: 6.9 g versus 8 g per 100 g.