Sangria vs Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack
Overall, Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Sangria
Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sangria | Frozen Cocktails - Strawberr... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 86 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6 g | 8.6 g |
| Salt | 18 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 60 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has 76% fewer calories (86 kcal vs 362 kcal).
- Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has no fat, while Sangria has 10 g.
- Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has no saturated fat, while Sangria has 10 g.
- Sangria has 30% less sugar (6 g vs 8.6 g).
- Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has 100% less salt (0.1 g vs 18 g).
- Sangria has 100% more protein (60 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sangria
Not available.
Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack
Wasser, Maltodextrin, Invertzucker, Alkohol, Zucker, Rum, Säureregulator (E330), Stabilisator (E466, E415), Geschmacksstoff, Konservierungsstoff (E202, E211), Süßstoffe (E955), Farbstoff (E129).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sangria or Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack?
Overall, Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frozen Cocktails - Strawberry Daiquiri 5-Pack has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sangria has less sugar: 6 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.