Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta vs Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella
Overall, Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta
Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exc... | Salsa Negra La Constancia Bo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 56 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | — |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella has 51% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 115 kcal).
- Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella has no fat, while Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has 9.8 g.
- Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has 86% less sugar (1.6 g vs 12 g).
- Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has 51% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has 100% more protein (1.6 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta
Not available.
Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta or Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella?
Overall, Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa Negra La Constancia Botella has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Alfredo Ragu Marca Exclusiva Con Tocineta has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.