Comparison
Salers vs Salers aop
Overall, Salers aop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salers | Salers aop |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 379 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salers aop has 10% less fat (27 g vs 30 g).
- Salers aop has no sugar, while Salers has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Salers
Not available.
Salers aop
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salers or Salers aop?
Overall, Salers aop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salers has fewer calories: 368 kcal versus 379 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salers aop has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.