Comparison

Salade de museau vs Museau de porc

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade de museauMuseau de porc
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 192 kcal 140 kcal
Fat 17 g 12 g
Saturated fat 4.7 g 3.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.1 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.5 g
Fiber 1.8 g 0.2 g
Protein 8.4 g 6.2 g
Additives08
AllergensNone listedMustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Museau de porc has 27% fewer calories (140 kcal vs 192 kcal).
  • Museau de porc has 29% less fat (12 g vs 17 g).
  • Museau de porc has 30% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Salade de museau has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Salade de museau has 89% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Salade de museau has 26% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Only Museau de porc lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Salade de museau

Not available.

Museau de porc

Museaude porc 48% (museau de porc 29,2%* (Origine : France), eau, sel,gélatine de porc, dextrose, gélifiant : carraghénanes, stabilisants : triphosphates et diphosphates ; ;conservateurs : ascorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium ; ; extraits d'épices), eau, oignons 15%,cornichons 6%, huile de colza, vinaigre d'alcool, moutarde de Dijon (eau,graines de moutarde, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), persil, sel, épaississant : gomme de xanthane. Peut contenir : céréales contenant du gluten, crustacés, œufs, poissons, mollusques, soja, lait, céleri.*Pourcentage exprimé sur le poids net total.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade de museau or Museau de porc?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Museau de porc has fewer calories: 140 kcal versus 192 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de museau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons