Comparison

Saint-Emilion - 2017 vs Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011

Overall, Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Saint-Emilion - 2017

La Cave d'Augustin Florent

NOVA 3

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Saint-Emilion - 2017	Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011
Nutri-Score	—	—
NOVA group	3	3
Calories	73 kcal	71 kcal
Fat	0.2 g	0.4 g
Saturated fat	0.1 g	0.1 g
Sugars	15.5 g	15 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0.9 g	1.4 g
Protein	0.7 g	0.6 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Sulphur dioxide and sulphites	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011 has 36% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
Only Saint-Emilion - 2017 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Saint-Emilion - 2017

raisin

Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011

Raisins noirs

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saint-Emilion - 2017 or Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011?

Overall, Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011 has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Montagne Saint-Emilion 2011 has less sugar: 15 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Château GRAND BIGAROUX -... vs Montagne Saint-Emilion 2... Château GRAND BIGAROUX -... vs Saint-Emilion - 2017 Montagne Saint-Emilion 2... vs Lussac Saint-Emilion 201... Saint-Emilion - 2017 vs Lussac Saint-Emilion 201... Montagne Saint-Emilion 2... vs Chapelle Saint-Pierre Montagne Saint-Emilion 2... vs Chapelle Saint-Valery 20... Saint-Emilion - 2017 vs Chapelle Saint-Pierre Saint-Emilion - 2017 vs Chapelle Saint-Valery 20...