Comparison

Sablé de retz vs Sables coco

Overall, Sablé de retz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSablé de retzSables coco
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 459 kcal 538 kcal
Fat 13 g 32 g
Saturated fat 4.7 g 25 g
Sugars 27 g 30 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.8 g —
Protein 7.5 g 6 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, Milk, BléNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sablé de retz has 15% fewer calories (459 kcal vs 538 kcal).
  • Sablé de retz has 59% less fat (13 g vs 32 g).
  • Sablé de retz has 81% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 25 g).
  • Sablé de retz has 10% less sugar (27 g vs 30 g).
  • Sables coco has 90% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Sablé de retz has 20% more protein (7.5 g vs 6 g).
  • Sablé de retz has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sablé de retz lists: Gluten, Milk, Blé.

Ingredients

Sablé de retz

Farine de Blé, sucre, noix de coco 11%, huile de tournesol non hadrogénée, poudres à lever (carbonates d'ammonium et de sodium, acide citrique), sel, lait écrémé en poudre, émulsifiant: lécithines. Traces éventuelles d'œufs, de graines de sésame et de fruits à coque tenir au sec et préserver de la chaleur.

Sables coco

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sablé de retz or Sables coco?

Overall, Sablé de retz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sablé de retz has fewer calories: 459 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sablé de retz has less sugar: 27 g versus 30 g per 100 g.

More comparisons