Comparison

S-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgott vs Zeezout waterwerken

Overall, Zeezout waterwerken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientS-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgo...Zeezout waterwerken
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 350 kcal 295 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 77 g 35 g
Salt 0 g 0.8 g
Protein 2.8 g 6.9 g
Additives16
AllergensGelatinNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Zeezout waterwerken has 16% fewer calories (295 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • S-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgott has no fat, while Zeezout waterwerken has 0.3 g.
  • Zeezout waterwerken has 55% less sugar (35 g vs 77 g).
  • S-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgott has no salt, while Zeezout waterwerken has 0.8 g.
  • Zeezout waterwerken has 59% more protein (6.9 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Zeezout waterwerken has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only S-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgott lists: Gelatin.

Ingredients

S-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgott

Sukker, ivertsukker, glukose, ammoniumklorid, gelatin, farge: vegetabilsk karbon, lakris, aroma

Zeezout waterwerken

suiker, verdikkingsmiddel (arabische gom), glucosestroop, gemodificeerd zetmeel, gelatine, salmiakzout, zoethoutwortelextract,zeezout (0,6%), natuurlijk aroma, glansmiddel (bijenwas), kleurstof (plantaardige koolstof).

FAQ

Which is healthier: S-Marke Salt Skum 70g Jamtgott or Zeezout waterwerken?

Overall, Zeezout waterwerken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zeezout waterwerken has fewer calories: 295 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Zeezout waterwerken has less sugar: 35 g versus 77 g per 100 g.

More comparisons