Rostbratwurst vs Zimbo Carnati Thuringer
Overall, Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Rostbratwurst
Zimbo Carnati Thuringer
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rostbratwurst | Zimbo Carnati Thuringer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 254 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.6 g | 8.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has 29% less sugar (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has 14% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.1 g).
- Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rostbratwurst
86% Schweinefleisch, Trinkwasser, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Gewürzextrakte, Stabilisatoren: (Natriumcitrate, Natriumacetate, Diphosphate), Gewürze, Dextrose, Glucosesirup, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Naturdarm (Schwein)
Zimbo Carnati Thuringer
Carne porc (83%), apa, sare, plante aromatice, dextroza, sirop de glucoza, condimente, extract de condimente, stabilizator: citrat de sodiu si difosfati, mono si digliceride ale acizilor grasi, acidifiant: acid citric. Membrana naturala de porc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rostbratwurst or Zimbo Carnati Thuringer?
Overall, Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has fewer calories: 254 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zimbo Carnati Thuringer has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.