Roquefort (31,7% MG) vs Roquefort
Overall, Roquefort has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roquefort (31,7% MG) | Roquefort |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 358 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 31.7 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 22.5 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.6 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Roquefort (31,7% MG) has no sugar, while Roquefort has 0.5 g.
- Roquefort has no salt, while Roquefort (31,7% MG) has 3.6 g.
- Roquefort has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Roquefort (31,7% MG)
_Lait_ cru de brebis, sel, ferments (dont _lait_), présure, Penicillium roqueforti.
Roquefort
Leche de oveja cruda y entera, sal, cuajo, fermentos lácticos de maduración, Penicillium Roquefortii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roquefort (31,7% MG) or Roquefort?
Overall, Roquefort has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Roquefort (31,7% MG) has fewer calories: 358 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roquefort (31,7% MG) has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.