Comparison
Romarin vs Origan
Overall, Romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Romarin | Origan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 140 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 42.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Romarin has 22% fewer calories (140 kcal vs 180 kcal).
- Romarin has no fat, while Origan has 4.3 g.
- Romarin has no saturated fat, while Origan has 1.6 g.
- Romarin has no sugar, while Origan has 4.1 g.
- Origan has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 5 g).
- Romarin has 55% more protein (20 g vs 9 g).
- Origan has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Romarin
Not available.
Origan
Origan émincé. Traces éventuelles d'arachides, de céréales contenant du gluten, de fruits à coque, de lait, de céleri et de moutarde.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Romarin or Origan?
Overall, Romarin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Romarin has fewer calories: 140 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Romarin has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.