Rodfrugtchips vs Chips de pomme de terre rouge
Overall, Chips de pomme de terre rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rodfrugtchips | Chips de pomme de terre roug... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 453 kcal | 516 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 30 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.6 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rodfrugtchips has 12% fewer calories (453 kcal vs 516 kcal).
- Rodfrugtchips has 71% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 11 g).
- Chips de pomme de terre rouge has 97% less sugar (1 g vs 30 g).
- Chips de pomme de terre rouge has 30% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Chips de pomme de terre rouge has 100% more fiber (5.6 g vs 0 g).
- Rodfrugtchips has 24% more protein (5.5 g vs 4.2 g).
- Chips de pomme de terre rouge has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rodfrugtchips
grønnsaker i varierende mengdeforhold (gulrot, pastinakk, rødbete) 73%, solsikkeolje 27%, salt
Chips de pomme de terre rouge
Pomme de terre*, huile de palme*, sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rodfrugtchips or Chips de pomme de terre rouge?
Overall, Chips de pomme de terre rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rodfrugtchips has fewer calories: 453 kcal versus 516 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips de pomme de terre rouge has less sugar: 1 g versus 30 g per 100 g.