RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** vs Rice drink coco
Overall, RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajo... | Rice drink coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rice drink coco has 12% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 60 kcal).
- Rice drink coco has 54% less fat (1.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has 73% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
- RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has 46% less sugar (4 g vs 7.4 g).
- RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has 38% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has the better Nutri-Score.
- RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés**
Eau, riz bio 14%, pâte de _noisettes_ toastées bio 3%, huile de tournesol bio , sel.
Rice drink coco
Eau, riz* 14%, lait de coco* 6%, sel marin, arôme naturel de noix de coco* * Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** or Rice drink coco?
Overall, RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rice drink coco has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
RIZ NOISETTE Sans sucres ajoutés** has less sugar: 4 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.