Comparison
Riz au crabe vs Riz au crabe
Overall, Riz au crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz au crabe | Riz au crabe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 187 kcal | 128 kcal |
| Fat | 11.3 g | 5.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz au crabe has 32% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 187 kcal).
- Riz au crabe has 50% less fat (5.7 g vs 11.3 g).
- Riz au crabe has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Riz au crabe has 40% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Riz au crabe has 36% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Riz au crabe has 49% more protein (6.8 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Riz au crabe
Not available.
Riz au crabe
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz au crabe or Riz au crabe?
Overall, Riz au crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz au crabe has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz au crabe has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.