Comparison

RILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g massif TRAD - FRANCE vs Rillettes de Poulet Rôti En cocotte

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g m...Rillettes de Poulet Rôti En...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 336 kcal 308 kcal
Fat 29 g 27 g
Saturated fat 9.2 g 7.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.5 g
Protein 18 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensAnhydride sulfureux et sulfites en concentrations de plus de 10 mg/kg ou 10 mg/litre expr. en SO2None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rillettes de Poulet Rôti En cocotte has 15% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 9.2 g).
  • RILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g massif TRAD - FRANCE has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
  • Only RILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g massif TRAD - FRANCE lists: Anhydride sulfureux et sulfites en concentrations de plus de 10 mg/kg ou 10 mg/litre expr. en SO2.

Ingredients

RILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g massif TRAD - FRANCE

Viande de poulet (origine : France), graisse de canard, peau de poulet (origine : France), carottes, échalotes semoule, pulpe d'oignons déshydratée, miel, sel, poivre.103g de poulet ont été utilisés pour fabriquer 100g de rillettes.

Rillettes de Poulet Rôti En cocotte

Viande de poulet 90%, graisse de poulet, oignons, tomates, carottes, sel, poivre. Poulet origine Union Européenne.

FAQ

Which is healthier: RILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g massif TRAD - FRANCE or Rillettes de Poulet Rôti En cocotte?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rillettes de Poulet Rôti En cocotte has fewer calories: 308 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

RILLETTES POULET ROTI 220g massif TRAD - FRANCE has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons