Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte vs Rillettes de poulet rôti
Overall, Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte
Rillettes de poulet rôti
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en... | Rillettes de poulet rôti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 32.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.1 g | 15.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15.7 g | 15.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has 12% less fat (29 g vs 32.8 g).
- Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has 42% less saturated fat (9.1 g vs 15.8 g).
- Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rillettes de poulet rôti is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte
Viande de poulet 90 % (origine : UE), graisse de poulet, peau de poulet, graisse de canard, plantes aromatiques, carottes, vinaigre d'alcool, miel, arôme, sel, poivre,
Rillettes de poulet rôti
Viande de poulet d'origine France (90%), graisse de canard, carottes, sel, miel, vinaigre d'alcool, ail, épices et plantes aromatiques.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte or Rillettes de poulet rôti?
Overall, Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.