Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte vs Rillettes de poulet rôti aux oignons confis
Overall, Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte
Rillettes de poulet rôti aux oignons confis
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en... | Rillettes de poulet rôti aux... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 334 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 29.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 8 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has 15% less saturated fat (8 g vs 9.4 g).
- Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte
90% viande de poulet (Origine: France), graisse de poulet, oignons, tomates, carottes, sel, poivre
Rillettes de poulet rôti aux oignons confis
Viande de poulet d'origine France (77%), graisse de canard, oignons caramélisés (6.6%) (oignons, huile de colza, sucre roux), oignons (5.3%), carottes, échalotes, ail, sel, poivre, vinaigre d'alcool, miel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte or Rillettes de poulet rôti aux oignons confis?
Overall, Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has fewer calories: 309 kcal versus 334 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rillettes de Poulet Rôti en cocotte has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.