Rillettes de poulet roti bordeau chesnel 220g offre decouverte vs Rillettes de poulet roti
Overall, Rillettes de poulet roti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Rillettes de poulet roti bordeau chesnel 220g offre decouverte
Rillettes de poulet roti
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rillettes de poulet roti bor... | Rillettes de poulet roti |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.2 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rillettes de poulet roti has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Rillettes de poulet roti bordeau chesnel 220g offre decouverte
viande de poulet* (90%), graisse de canard, carottes, sel , épices et plantes aromatiques. *Viande d'origine UE, majoritairement française. 100% Volaille
Rillettes de poulet roti
Viande de poulet 96%, graisse de canard, peau de poulet, carottes, échalotes, pulpe d'oignons déshydratée, miel, sel, poivre. Élaboré à partir de viande de poulet origine France, Espagne, Pologne et Hongrie et de graisse de canard origine U.E.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rillettes de poulet roti bordeau chesnel 220g offre decouverte or Rillettes de poulet roti?
Overall, Rillettes de poulet roti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rillettes de poulet roti bordeau chesnel 220g offre decouverte has fewer calories: 330 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rillettes de poulet roti bordeau chesnel 220g offre decouverte has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.