Rillettes de boeuf à la graisse de canard vs Rillettes de bœuf angus bio
Overall, Rillettes de bœuf angus bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rillettes de boeuf à la grai... | Rillettes de bœuf angus bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 483 kcal | 439 kcal |
| Fat | 48 g | 42 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rillettes de bœuf angus bio has 13% less fat (42 g vs 48 g).
- Rillettes de bœuf angus bio has 11% less saturated fat (16 g vs 18 g).
- Rillettes de boeuf à la graisse de canard has 100% more protein (1.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Rillettes de boeuf à la graisse de canard
Not available.
Rillettes de bœuf angus bio
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rillettes de boeuf à la graisse de canard or Rillettes de bœuf angus bio?
Overall, Rillettes de bœuf angus bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rillettes de bœuf angus bio has fewer calories: 439 kcal versus 483 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rillettes de boeuf à la graisse de canard has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.