Comparison
Rigatoni n°50 vs Rigatoni
Overall, Rigatoni n°50 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rigatoni n°50 | Rigatoni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rigatoni n°50 has 20% less fat (1.6 g vs 2 g).
- Rigatoni n°50 has 11% less sugar (3.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Rigatoni n°50 has 10% more protein (14.5 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Rigatoni n°50
Semoule de _blé_ dur
Rigatoni
Semola di grano duro, acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rigatoni n°50 or Rigatoni?
Overall, Rigatoni n°50 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rigatoni n°50 has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rigatoni n°50 has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.