Comparison
Riesling 2023 vs BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard
Overall, BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riesling 2023 | BICycle Chardonnay & Colomba... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard has 99% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard has 99% less sugar (0.2 g vs 15.5 g).
- Riesling 2023 has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Only BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Riesling 2023
Raisin
BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard
Grapes, sulphites.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riesling 2023 or BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard?
Overall, BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
BICycle Chardonnay & Colombard has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.