Rice turron vs Turrón de chocolate clásico
Overall, Turrón de chocolate clásico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rice turron | Turrón de chocolate clásico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 556 kcal | 521 kcal |
| Fat | 32.7 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 54 g | 50 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Turrón de chocolate clásico has 14% less fat (28 g vs 32.7 g).
- Turrón de chocolate clásico has 33% less saturated fat (10 g vs 15 g).
- Only Turrón de chocolate clásico lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Rice turron
Not available.
Turrón de chocolate clásico
Azúcar, frutos de cáscara (_almendras_ molidas, _avellanas_ molidas), manteca de cacao, arroz inflado 9% (harina de arroz, azúcar, sal, emulgente (E471)), pasta de cacao, _leche_ desnatada en polvo, suero de _leche_ en polvo, grasa de _leche_, emulgente (lecitina de _soja_), aroma.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rice turron or Turrón de chocolate clásico?
Overall, Turrón de chocolate clásico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Turrón de chocolate clásico has fewer calories: 521 kcal versus 556 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Turrón de chocolate clásico has less sugar: 50 g versus 54 g per 100 g.