Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de vs Raviolis du Dauphiné
Overall, Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de
Raviolis du Dauphiné
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL R... | Raviolis du Dauphiné |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 285 kcal | 287 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.1 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de has 17% less sugar (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de has 44% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de
Pate 50%: Farine de BLE tendre, eau, OEUFS frais, huile de tournesol. Farce 50 % : COMTE 22.4%, FROMAGE blanc frais, persil, OEUFS frais, sel, BEURRE. (Pourcentages exprimés sur l'ensemble du produit)
Raviolis du Dauphiné
Farine de blé tendre 36 %, fromage frais 22 %, Comté AOP 14%, Emmental français Est-Central IGP 8,9 %, eau, œufs frais, persil, sel, contient huile de tournesol et/ou huile de colza, beurre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de or Raviolis du Dauphiné?
Overall, Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de has fewer calories: 285 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ravioles du Dauphiné LABEL ROUGE IGP Lot de has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.