Comparison
Pur jus de citron BIO vs Citroensap
Overall, Citroensap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pur jus de citron BIO | Citroensap |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 27 kcal | 22 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Citroensap has 19% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 27 kcal).
- Pur jus de citron BIO has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Citroensap has 47% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Citroensap has 80% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
- Citroensap has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Citroensap lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Pur jus de citron BIO
JUS DE CITRON 100%
Citroensap
Ingrédients - JUS DE CITRON À BASE DE CONCENTRÉ - Jus de citron à base de concentré, conservateur [E224 (sulfites)].
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pur jus de citron BIO or Citroensap?
Overall, Citroensap has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Citroensap has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 27 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Citroensap has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.