Comparison

Pulpe de tomates en dés vs Star tomat sachy

Overall, Pulpe de tomates en dés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPulpe de tomates en désStar tomat sachy
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 20 kcal 60 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 3 g 7.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.2 g
Fiber 1.1 g —
Protein 1.3 g 1.5 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pulpe de tomates en dés has 67% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 60 kcal).
  • Pulpe de tomates en dés has 60% less sugar (3 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Pulpe de tomates en dés has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Pulpe de tomates en dés has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pulpe de tomates en dés is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Star tomat sachy lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pulpe de tomates en dés

Tomates pelées concassées en dés 60 %, jus de tomate, acidifiant : acide citrique.

Star tomat sachy

Eau, conce), sucre, huile de soja, épaississ (Sorbate de potassium et benzoate de sodium pour 1000 de sauce trgel, arome, epices, conservate amidons modifiés correcteur d'acidité: acide citrique. كونات ، ماء ، مركز الطماطم ( 155) غرام من الطعاطم في 100 غرام ة ، توابل، مواد حافظة (سوربات البوتاسيوم و بنروات الصوديوم) و صلصة الطماطم) ، سكر ، زيت الصوجا، مواد متخنة : نشا معدل ملح العام الحموضة : حامض الستريك.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pulpe de tomates en dés or Star tomat sachy?

Overall, Pulpe de tomates en dés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pulpe de tomates en dés has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pulpe de tomates en dés has less sugar: 3 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons