Comparison

Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 vs Sauce tomate provençale 680g

Overall, Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2Sauce tomate provençale 680g
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 23 kcal 64 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 2.3 g 4.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.7 g 2.2 g
Protein 1.4 g 1.4 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has 64% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 64 kcal).
  • Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has 84% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has 53% less sugar (2.3 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Sauce tomate provençale 680g has 23% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Sauce tomate provençale 680g lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2

Tomates concassées, jus de tomate, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique.

Sauce tomate provençale 680g

Purée et pulpe de tomates 83%, légumes (oignons 5%, carottes 4%), huile de tournesol, épices et plantes aromatiques 1,6% (dont céleri), sucre, sel, amidon transformé de maïs.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 or Sauce tomate provençale 680g?

Overall, Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pulpe de tomates - 3x400 1/2 has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons