Comparison
Pülleken vs Pils
Overall, Pils has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Pülleken | Pils |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pils has 12% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 43 kcal).
Ingredients
Pülleken
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen Energie pro 100 ml: 179 kJ/43 kcal
Pils
Brauwasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pülleken or Pils?
Overall, Pils has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pils has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pülleken has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.