Comparison

Prime - Blue Chill vs Electrolyte Drink Mix

Overall, Prime - Blue Chill has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPrime - Blue ChillElectrolyte Drink Mix
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 4 kcal 281 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.2 g 68.8 g
Salt 0 g 7.8 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives84
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Prime - Blue Chill has 99% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 281 kcal).
  • Prime - Blue Chill has 100% less sugar (0.2 g vs 68.8 g).
  • Prime - Blue Chill has 100% less salt (0 g vs 7.8 g).

Ingredients

Prime - Blue Chill

WATER, COCONUT WATER CONCENTRATE, CITRIC ACID, DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, TRIMAGNESIUM CITRATE, L-ISOLEUCINE, L-LEUCINE, L-VALINE, SUCRALOSE, GUM ARABIC, ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, NATURAL FLAVORS, ESTER GUM, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE (VITAMIN B6), D-ALPHA TOCOPHERYL ACETATE (VITAMIN E), RETINYL PALMITATE (VITAMIN A), CYANOCOBALAMIN (VITAMIN B12)

Electrolyte Drink Mix

CANE SUGAR, DEXTROSE, CITRIC ACID, SALT, POTASSIUM CITRATE, SODIUM CITRATE, DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE, L-THEANINE, SILICON DIOXIDE, COFFEEBERRY ENERGY COFFEE FRUIT, EXTRACT, STEVIA LEAF EXTRACT (REBAUDIOSIDE A), COGNATIO, COFFEE FRUIT EXTRACT, VITAMIN C (ASCORBIC ACID), NATURAL, FLAVORS, VITAMIN B3 (NIACINAMIDE), VITAMIN B5 (CALCIUM, D-PANTOTHENATE), VITAMIN B6 (PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE), VITAMIN B12 (CYANOCOBALAMIN)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Prime - Blue Chill or Electrolyte Drink Mix?

Overall, Prime - Blue Chill has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Prime - Blue Chill has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 281 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Prime - Blue Chill has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 68.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons