Préparation pour taboulé au miel vs Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth
Overall, Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Préparation pour taboulé au... | Préparation pour taboulé bet... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 122 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 9.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth has 36% less sugar (3.2 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Préparation pour taboulé au miel
Not available.
Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Préparation pour taboulé au miel or Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth?
Overall, Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Préparation pour taboulé betterave et aneth has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 5 g per 100 g.