Comparison

Précuit miche T100 vs La Pinsa Classica

Overall, Précuit miche T100 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPrécuit miche T100La Pinsa Classica
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 242 kcal 262 kcal
Fat 1 g 6 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 1 g
Sugars 1.3 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.8 g
Fiber 3.7 g 3.5 g
Protein 8 g 8.3 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Précuit miche T100 has 83% less fat (1 g vs 6 g).
  • Précuit miche T100 has 80% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Précuit miche T100 has 27% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Précuit miche T100 is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Précuit miche T100

Farine de blé complète T110*(1), eau, levain* (farine de blé demi-complète*(1), eau), sel de Guérande, rhum* pour la conservation. *Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique. 400 g Etiquette magasin

La Pinsa Classica

Farire de BLÉ TENDRE, eau, semoule remoulue de BLE DUR, levain (4,9%) (farine de BLÉ, eau), huile d'olive extra vierge (4.7%), sel, malt d'ORGE, farine de BLÉ malté. GLUTEN, levure. Peut contenir lait, soja, moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Précuit miche T100 or La Pinsa Classica?

Overall, Précuit miche T100 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Précuit miche T100 has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Précuit miche T100 has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons