Comparison
Porto ruby Vieilli en cave vs Porto 10
Overall, Porto 10 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Porto ruby Vieilli en cave | Porto 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Porto 10 has no calories, while Porto ruby Vieilli en cave has 36 kcal.
- Only Porto ruby Vieilli en cave lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Porto ruby Vieilli en cave
Contient des sulfites. Pour Dom Joaquim
Porto 10
Portwein
FAQ
Which is healthier: Porto ruby Vieilli en cave or Porto 10?
Overall, Porto 10 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Porto 10 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 36 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Porto ruby Vieilli en cave has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.