Pommes extra dünn vs Rustica
Overall, Pommes extra dünn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes extra dünn | Rustica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 135 kcal | 503 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 9.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 5.4 g |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes extra dünn has 73% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 503 kcal).
- Pommes extra dünn has 88% less fat (3.2 g vs 27 g).
- Pommes extra dünn has 96% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 9.4 g).
- Pommes extra dünn has 86% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Rustica has 54% more fiber (5.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Rustica has 68% more protein (7.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Pommes extra dünn has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pommes extra dünn
potato 96%, sunflower oil 4%
Rustica
Patate, oli vegetali (palma, girasole alto oleico), sale. Può contenere latte, senape, soia e sedano.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes extra dünn or Rustica?
Overall, Pommes extra dünn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes extra dünn has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 503 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes extra dünn has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.