Pomme châtaigne BIO vs Pomme Châtaigne Spécialité de fruits
Overall, Pomme châtaigne BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pomme châtaigne BIO
Pomme Châtaigne Spécialité de fruits
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pomme châtaigne BIO | Pomme Châtaigne Spécialité d... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pomme châtaigne BIO has 35% fewer calories (82 kcal vs 126 kcal).
- Pomme châtaigne BIO has 36% less sugar (16 g vs 25 g).
- Pomme Châtaigne Spécialité de fruits has 45% more fiber (2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Pomme châtaigne BIO has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pomme châtaigne BIO
Purée de pommes 82,9%, préparation de châtaignes d'Ardèche vanillée 17% (sucre“, marrons* 5,9%, eau, extrait de vanille* 0,017%), antioxydant : acide ascorbique. Issus de l'agriculture biológique. Dotrouvons-0ous cur
Pomme Châtaigne Spécialité de fruits
Purée de pommes 59,9 %, sucre, châtaignes 16%, sucre roux de canne, extrait de vanille, jus concentré d'acérola, jus de citrons concentré. Spécialité de fruits fabriquée en France à partir de pommes origine France et de châtaignes origine UE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pomme châtaigne BIO or Pomme Châtaigne Spécialité de fruits?
Overall, Pomme châtaigne BIO has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pomme châtaigne BIO has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pomme châtaigne BIO has less sugar: 16 g versus 25 g per 100 g.