Comparison

Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% vs Jus de Pomme Cassis

Overall, Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientPomme Cassis Framboise - Ten...Jus de Pomme Cassis
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 38 kcal 49 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 8.8 g 11 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.1 g —
Protein 0.6 g 0.1 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has 22% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 49 kcal).
  • Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has 20% less sugar (8.8 g vs 11 g).
  • Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has 83% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12%

Eau 80% - jus de fruits à base de concentrés 12% (pomme 8% - cassis 2.9% - framboise 1.2%) - sucre - acidifiant : acide citrique - arôme - colorant : anthocyanes

Jus de Pomme Cassis

Jus de pomme 90% jus de cassis 10% sans colorant ni conservateur, sans addition de sucre, conformement à la législation en vigueur. Conservé exclusivement par pasterisation non gazéifié.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% or Jus de Pomme Cassis?

Overall, Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pomme Cassis Framboise - Teneur en fruits 12% has less sugar: 8.8 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons