Polaris VitalRed Gazowany vs Dzik Arbuz
Overall, Dzik Arbuz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Polaris VitalRed Gazowany | Dzik Arbuz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dzik Arbuz has 86% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 14 kcal).
- Polaris VitalRed Gazowany has no fat, while Dzik Arbuz has 0.5 g.
- Dzik Arbuz has no sugar, while Polaris VitalRed Gazowany has 3.4 g.
- Dzik Arbuz has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Dzik Arbuz has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Polaris VitalRed Gazowany
naturalna woda mineralna; syrop glukozowo-fruktozowy; dwutlenek węgla; regulator kwasowości: kwas cytrynowy; aromat; ekstrakt z melisy (0,01%); ekstrakt z rooibos (0,002%); substancja konserwująca: benzoesan sodu; substancje słodzące (aspartam, acesulfam K); substancje wzbogacające (witamina B6, kwas foliowy).
Dzik Arbuz
Woda, kwas: kwas cytrynowy; dwutlenek węgla, regulator kwasowości: cytryniany sodu; aromaty, ekstrakt z korzenia żeń-szenia (Panax ginseng) (0,08 %); substancje słodzące: acesulfam K, sukraloza; sól, winian L-karnityny (0,015%); inozytol, witaminy: niacyna, kwas pantotenowy, witamina B6, witamina B12
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polaris VitalRed Gazowany or Dzik Arbuz?
Overall, Dzik Arbuz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dzik Arbuz has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dzik Arbuz has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.