Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés vs Poires Williams de la Vallée du Rhône
Overall, Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés
Poires Williams de la Vallée du Rhône
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poire Williams sans sucre aj... | Poires Williams de la Vallée... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 72 kcal | 196 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 17.5 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 17.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has 63% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 196 kcal).
- Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has 64% less sugar (17.5 g vs 48 g).
- Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has 90% more fiber (17.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Poires Williams de la Vallée du Rhône has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés
Poire Williams 65% (origine UE), fibre naturelle soluble, gélifiants : pectine, jus de citron concentré.
Poires Williams de la Vallée du Rhône
Poires 65 g, sucre de canne 40.8 g, gélifiant : pectines, jus de citron concentré.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés or Poires Williams de la Vallée du Rhône?
Overall, Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 196 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poire Williams sans sucre ajoutés has less sugar: 17.5 g versus 48 g per 100 g.