Comparison
Pita piquant vs Salsa Pita Aljawda
Overall, Pita piquant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pita piquant | Salsa Pita Aljawda |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 230 kcal | 559 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 61.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pita piquant has 59% fewer calories (230 kcal vs 559 kcal).
- Pita piquant has 72% less fat (17 g vs 61.5 g).
- Pita piquant has 76% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 5 g).
- Salsa Pita Aljawda has no sugar, while Pita piquant has 4.9 g.
- Salsa Pita Aljawda has 52% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pita piquant has 91% more protein (10 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Pita piquant
Not available.
Salsa Pita Aljawda
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pita piquant or Salsa Pita Aljawda?
Overall, Pita piquant has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pita piquant has fewer calories: 230 kcal versus 559 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Pita Aljawda has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.